akashiver: (Default)
akashiver ([personal profile] akashiver) wrote2011-09-07 02:09 pm
Entry tags:

Why don't men get raped in "gritty" high fantasy?

So I never mentioned Sady Doyle's George R.R. Martin piece in part because I didn't think it warranted the attention. Doyle clearly wanted to skewer the series. She makes some good points, she makes some funny points, and she also misses the mark.

Alyssa Rosenburg had a thoughtful response. To this I'd add that I have a problem with Doyle's pre-mockery of her respondents, and specifically her portrayal of them as 'nerds upset that she doesn't like their toys.'

For the record, when you begin a blog post with  sentences like "George R.R. Martin is creepy," you are not talking about toys. Last time I checked, Martin was a person.  

The fact that Doyle then uses this "toys" rhetoric to justify deleting critical comments is disturbing. I don't have a lot of respect for the author of an article about rape who  a) objectifies others b) uses this objectification to deny that she is actually talking about Real People and c) silences her critics rather than allowing their voices to be heard.

But reading Doyle's article did make me wish that I could point to a couple scenes of male rape in the GoT books, or in "gritty" high fantasy in general. It's not as though men don't get raped. They *particularly* run the risk of getting raped in war. But it's not a problem society likes to acknowledge in real life or in fiction.

Which brings me to this very interesting article in the Guardian: The Rape of Men.

Twenty-one per cent of Sri Lankan males who were seen at a London torture treatment centre reported sexual abuse while in detention. In El Salvador, 76% of male political prisoners surveyed in the 1980s described at least one incidence of sexual torture. A study of 6,000 concentration-camp inmates in Sarajevo found that 80% of men reported having been raped.


Not only does male rape happen, but all indicators point to it happening a lot in war. But it's almost never  reported. The reasons for this are steeped in patriarchy's construction of masculine power, and can have consequences that differ from those facing female rape victims.


Often, she says, wives who discover their husbands have been raped decide to leave them. "They ask me: 'So now how am I going to live with him? As what? Is this still a husband? Is it a wife?' They ask, 'If he can be raped, who is protecting me?' There's one family I have been working closely with in which the husband has been raped twice. When his wife discovered this, she went home, packed her belongings, picked up their child and left. Of course that brought down this man's heart."


In short, I think Martin's overdue to address male rape in Westeros. We've had at least one man get sexually tortured and mutilated, but so far male rape hasn't even been threatened.

(Or has it? Those books are so damn long I might have missed something.)

[identity profile] tooth-and-claw.livejournal.com 2011-09-07 07:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Funny; this is the same thing I've been saying about the whole subject, particularly the male rape part. You pinpointed pretty much everything wrong in Ms. Doyle's article, and why it left a slimy taste in my mouth. I've been arguing against it since-- not arguing about whether we should be discussing the initial conceit (rape as a tool of violence in fantasy)-- but arguing about how dismissive, careless, and condescending her article was. I didn't know she was deleting comments on top of all things.



[identity profile] swan-tower.livejournal.com 2011-09-07 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for linking to the Rosenburg; I hadn't read that, and it's fabulously cogent in its points. There's pretty much nothing left for me to do but stand up and cheer, and then also applaud your point about "toys."

As for rape of men -- well. The people writing this kind of story are mostly guys. I'm not surprised they're so reluctant to think about male rape. But Rosenburg's point applies here, too; if something like that is so prevalent in reality, we don't do ourselves any favors by airbrushing it out of our fiction just because it's uncomfortable. (Unfortunately, just imagine the internet shitstorm that would result if an author, especially a female author, "victimized" her male characters in that fashion.)

[identity profile] akashiver.livejournal.com 2011-09-08 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know what kind of shitstorm would happen, or even if any storm would happen at all. I'm thinking the author and story would make a huge difference: if it's a well-loved character from a long-running fantasy series, then yes, shitstorm central.

If not... I'd like to think a lot of this would depend on the tone in the book, and whether readers had picked up that it would be *that* sort of novel.

[identity profile] swan-tower.livejournal.com 2011-09-08 06:06 am (UTC)(link)
I'm thinking if, say, a new epic fantasy opened with Our Hero locked in a dungeon, and then he gets raped by one of his captors. (Put it on the same page number as Thomas Covenant raping that woman in Lord Foul's Bane, for the purpose of comparison.) Presuming this is a high-profile enough epic fantasy to get widespread attention in the first place, the outcry, I think, would be huge. Because now you've gotten Teh Gay all over the epic fantasy fanboys, and their happy fantasy of being the hero has been scarred by the notion that men can be sexually victimized, and huh, it doesn't look so hot now that the tables have turned.

And if a female author did that? Ye gods. She would be a man-hating bitch, clearly. Women being raped is the natural order, but only a bitch would write about the reverse.

. . . oddly, the closest example I can think of in epic fantasy to a man being sexually victimized is in Wizard's First Rule. Unfortunately for all involved, there is not enough brain bleach in the world to erase the stain of where that storyline ended up going.

[identity profile] akashiver.livejournal.com 2011-09-12 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
I still have to read Lord Foul's Bane, actually. One of these days, when I feel like a nice dose of misogyny...

[identity profile] swan-tower.livejournal.com 2011-09-12 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
Why exactly do you have to read it? I can give you chapter and verse in counter-argument, if you want.

[identity profile] mariness.livejournal.com 2011-09-07 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a very strong implication in A Feast for Crows that a major, non-point of view character sexually abused and raped his younger brothers; in their point of view chapters they've repressed most, but not all, of the memories, and remain terrified of the abuser and convinced he is evil.

[identity profile] akashiver.livejournal.com 2011-09-08 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
Underneath a spoiler cut - who was that again? It's been a while.

[identity profile] swan-tower.livejournal.com 2011-09-08 06:12 am (UTC)(link)
Gregor Clegane, maybe? Or one of the Greyjoys. Probably the latter, since I think there's only the two Clegane brothers. But I don't really remember.

[identity profile] d-c-m.livejournal.com 2011-09-12 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Not only does male rape happen, but all indicators point to it happening a lot in war.
Yes. And this is very sad. And scarey.